Electronic Bulletin Number 60 - June, 2009

 
 

IPv6 – Unified Future

 
Email this Article | Print this page | Home
 

Discussions about IPv4/IPv6 are undoubtedly taking place in every arena but, to be fair, when say arenas what we mean is technological arenas, at both the private and state levels. Society in general does not have the slightest clue as to what is going on and, generally speaking, neither does anyone know what an IP address is, which, in fact, is not a negative nor does it have any bearing on technological development, much like going for a doctor’s appointment because of an illness does not mean that one would expect the doctor to give a scientific explanation of what the problem is, but rather would only need the doctor to deal with it. The issue of the Internet is similar: a user/client places a call to a call center to report a problem, wanting them to resolve it. If they change the client’s dynamic IP or if the routing table gets corrupted, it means nothing to this user/client.

For Internet service providers, such a situation brings on a much greater responsibility in terms of connectivity as well as services and content.

Take security issues, for example. They have become a major global Internet problem. Implementing IPv6 can help to significantly address this issue. Now, the authorities responsible for that kind of security in any arena in which Internet is developed, spend hundreds of millions on different solutions to this scourge, but…. There is minimal, if any, attention to solutions arising from this new protocol–which is really not so new any more—which costs relatively little to implement.

In addition to what is outlined in the preceding paragraph, we could add the depletion of IPv4 addresses, an issue that has been more than dealt with in nearly every forum. Although some progress is being made in raising awareness, it is slow, but in the mean time, the depletion “deadline” is fast approaching. The figure below, provided by Lacnic, illustrates this, explaining in clear terms what has been described.

The figures correspond to /8 on the IANA central pool. This number of blocks would mean that as long as demand does not increase, on January 1, 2011 the /8 blocks would be depleted—a scenario this is more than likely.

All organizations, public and private, have professional capacity for this technology, so as to prevent any problems arising with this transition, and all that is needed is a political decision for problem-solving. Let us hope that such a decision is not held back until the last minute.

 

Oscar Messano
Rapporteur
Group on issues relative to Internet resources

 

 
 
 

© Copyright 2009. Inter-American Telecommunication Commission
Organization of American States.
1889 F St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006 - United States
Tel. (202)458-3004 | Fax. (202) 458-6854 | [email protected] | http://citel.oas.org

To unsubscribe please follow this link: [email protected]