1.0 Plan Introduction The United Nations has declared the decade of 1990-2000 as ?The International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction. For many developing countries, this decade also represents a period in which confronting natural disasters is synonymous to development: the cost of rehabilitation and reconstruction after disaster consume the disposable capital thus significantly reducing funds for new investments. The losses caused by natural disasters are dreadful. The destruction indicators have increased decade to decade. The adverse effects on employment, commercial balance and foreign debt are felt years after the disaster takes place. These activities whose purpose is to promote the development, frequently aggravate the impact on natural hazards. It is in the poorest countries and especially, in the population?s poorest divisions, that suffer the most severe impacts. International aid and rehabilitation programs only compensate a small percentage of the losses for affected countries. The good news is that, of all the environmental problems, natural risks are the most manageable. They can quickly be identified, arrange for mitigation measures and the benefits of reducing the vulnerability can, in a large part, are larger than the costs. Moreover, experience shows that the impact of natural hazards can be reduced. For example, hurricane management prevention and evacuation systems have extraordinarily reduced the number of deaths. The combination of structural caution measures and non-mitigation structures have shown that they reduce the effects of storms, landslides, floods and droughts. The member states of the Organization of American States (OAS) have slowly taken action for either the vulnerability reduction or the solicitation of funds for related purposes. The financial development organizations dispose little finances and the majority of cooperations for development organizations loan very few services in these aspects. In spite of the strength of mitigation measures in function to the cost, more than 90% of international funds assigned to natural disaster management in our region, are designated to disaster participation activities, aid, rehabilitation, reconstruction. Only 10% are designed for prevention activities 2.0 The Education Sector and Disasters School facilities, in addition to their role as learning centers, are important infrastructural components of any community. The schools house children and their teachers for a large part of the day. Quite often, community leaders and the general public use them to hold meetings, and they frequently serve as shelters during an emergency. Schools are the repositories of libraries and audio-visual equipment. When a school is vulnerable to natural hazards, and many are, the welfare of the entire community is at risk. Schools are an important resources. the investment in vulnerability reduction to natural disasters result in savings. The communities identify with schools because they are key institutions for development. To protect the students is to protect one of the most important resources of the community. 3.0 Initiatives Toward a Hemispheric Plan 3.1 Until 1998-Traditional programs based in the sector?s and local community?s participation for purpose of protection and the rescue of the student population: . The Conference of PAHO in San José, Costa Rica (1986) . The Red Cross . Partners for America . PAHO . OFDA-USAID 3.2 1988-92- Enlargement of preparatory and rescue programs complemented by vulnerability reduction programs of the educational physical infrastructure. . OAS began to focus on physical infrastructure vulnerability. 3.3 1992-93- Action initiative and programs at the regional level in order to formalize an integral focus on disaster reduction at the education level. . The conference of the PAHO-OAS-IDNDR in Mexico . The theme of IDNDR ?Disaster Reduction in Schools and Hospitals is Your Business? 3.4 1993-1996- Evolution of design and implementation of integral programs and calls for hemispheric action. . OAS-ECHO Program in Central America . Hemispheric Congress on Disaster Reduction and Sustainable Development . The Presidential Summit of Santa Cruz, Bolivia . Hemispheric Conference 3.5 1997- Hemispheric Plan Preparation 4.0 International and Regional Organization Activities 4.1 The Organization of American States The Organization of American States (OAS), with the financial support of the European Community Humanitarian Office (ECHO), has developed the OAS-ECHO Program for Natural Hazard Vulnerability Reduction for the Education Sector (NHVRPES), which adheres to the initiatives of the following institutions: The Pan American Organization of Health (PAHO), The Department of Humanitarian Affairs of the United Nations (UNDHA), Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance-US Agency for International Development (OFDA-USAID), Office of Development Assistance (ODA) England and the University of Central Venezuela (UCV). The NHVRPES is part of the program for the natural hazard vulnerability reduction of economic and social infrastructure of the Unit of Sustainable Development and Environment (USDE) of the OAS in Washington D.C. The USDE provides technical cooperation for natural disasters management for the member states of the OAS, through technical assistance, training and technology transfer for the formulation of policies, specialized information divulgation, hazard evaluations and formulation of measures to mitigate the risk in investment projects. 4.2 Pan American Health Organization The Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) is the sanitary agency of the United Nations for the hemisphere. Since 1977, through its program for Preparedness for Disaster Situations, PAHO is working with the countries of the hemisphere to improve the mitigation and prevention of disasters in the regional and national range. Since the beginning of the decade of the eighties the organization works with universities in training professionals and in including in the curriculum topics related to disaster management. In the late eighties PAHO worked more intensively in vulnerability reduction of health sector infrastructure and more recently, potable water distribution systems. This cooperation was possible, among other reasons, due to the creation of a Regional Documentation Center for Disaster, the collaboration of a PAHO center in Medellin, national documentation efforts, and support from CIDA Canada, OFDA-USAID, OIDA-England, ECHO of the European Community, and other donors. 4.3 The Department of Humanitarian Affairs of the United Nations The Department of Humanitarian Affairs of the United Nations (UNDHA) is the department of the United Nations that is in charge of strengthening and improving the efficiency of the international community efforts and particularly those of the United Nations? system to insure a prompt, integral and effective international response to humanitarian emergencies, as the implementation of prevention, mitigation and preparedness measures against disasters. The UNDHA has collaborated with other organizations to launch programs of prevention, mitigation and preparedness against disaster in more than 70 countries in Latin America, Africa and Asia. During the present decade (1990-2000), the UNDHA is responsible for the Secretariat of the International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction (IDNDR). 4.4 The International Decade for Natural Hazard Reduction The International Decade for Natural Hazard Reduction (IDNHR) was initiated by the United Nations General Assembly that seeks to create world-wide consciousness of the necessity of prevention and preparedness against disasters. The objective of the decade is to reduce the loss of lives, property damage and social and economic disturbances caused by disasters; through the international actions concentrated especially in developing countries. 4.5 Partners of the Americas Partners of the Americas was funded in 1964 as a component of the Alliance for Progress promoted by President John F. Kennedy of the United States of America. It is private institution whose volunteers are located in all of the hemisphere. It is dedicated to the promotion of economic and social development and technical training; fostering relationships and cooperation between cities in the Americas. The principal fields that promote companionship are reflected in five central community development themes: culture, natural resource management, agriculture, rural development, training and health. 4.6 Coordination Center for Central American Natural Disaster Prevention. The Coordination Center for Central American Natural Disaster Prevention (CCCANDP) is a disaster reduction entity of promotion and coordination in Central America. Its constitution establishes ?Natural Disaster Reduction? as a principal objective and more concretely: the Center promotes and coordinates international cooperation, information exchange, experience, technical assistance, and technical prevention material that effects natural disaster reduction. It also contributes to the improvement of making decisions concerning planning and management benefiting the inhabitants of Central America. 4.7 Central American Educational and Cultural Coordination. The Central American Educational and Cultural Coordination (CECC) was created in 1982 with the objective of developing and intensifying the relations between Central American cities by means of permanent cooperation and mutual aid in the fields of education and culture in order to support integral development of the member countries. Also CECC looks to stimulate the integral development of man, including the cultural component within the educational processes and to reaffirm the cultural identity of each of the member countries. 4.8 The Net for Social Studies concerning Disaster Prevention in Latin America The Net for Social Studies concerning Disaster Prevention in Latin America (The Net) was formed in 1992. It is a group of individuals and institutions from different parts of the American continent that promotes and supports research, training, instruction and data base and publication programs constructed from the social perspective on risk and disaster problems. 4.9 Regional Information Center on Disasters The Regional Information Center on Disasters (CRID) is a multi-organizational center based on the former Disaster Documentation Center of PAHO-IDNHR headquartered in San José, Costa Rica. The specific objectives of CRID are: to improve and enlarge of disaster information accumulation, processing and distribution; to strengthen national and local training for creating and maintaining information centers; to advance communication by INTERNET; and to contribute the development of Regional Disaster Information Systems. 5.0 Mandate Indorsement 5.1 Global/General 1988- United Nation Resolution creating the International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction (IDNDR). May, 1994- World Conference on Natural Disaster Reduction. Yokohama, Japan. Regional, national, international groups discuss measures on how to reduce world-wide natural disaster costs and how to generate enthusiasm for long term sustainable approach in disaster reduction. 5.2 Hemispheric/ General October- Resolution 546(834/90) of the OAS Permanent Council to participate in the International Decade of Natural Disaster Reduction (IDNDR). Resolution by means of which the OAS activities declare in the area of natural hazard management and solicit and encourage the OAS Secretary General and member states to include natural hazard risk management as an economic developmental element of the member countries. Also, it intends to make the United Nations aware of the role of the OAS and the different programs that this organization has supported in relation to natural hazard mitigation. October, 1992- Resolution 593(922/92) of the OAS Permanent Council to participate in Natural Disaster Reduction for Sustainable Development. A Resolution by means of which reaffirms the support of the OAS in obtaining the proposed objectives and goals of the International Decade for Natural Hazard Reduction and to encourage the continuation of risk mitigation efforts to be an integral part in the Secretary General?s technical assistance programs of the Secretary General of said organizations. March, 1993- Resolution 862/93 of the OAS Inter-American Council for Education, Science and Culture (CIECC) A resolution by means of which declared the support of ?Natural Hazard Reduction for Sustainable Development?...The preparation process of loan projects and of technical and management cooperation and the measures required to mitigate the adverse impact of natural disasters, are important components of the technical cooperations that lend money to the OAS; as it is established in the following resolutions: CP/RES.593 (992/92), CP/RES (834/90), CIES/RES.417 (XXIII-0/88) and CIES/4462. March, 1994- Declaration of Cartagena of the Inter-American Conference on Natural Hazard Reduction. Government representatives of the countries of the Americas, organizations, institutions and agencies met with the purpose of promoting policies, studies and technologies that look to reduce natural hazard vulnerability and look to strengthen administrative and organizational disaster prevention and reduction systems. December, 1994- The Presidential Congress of Miami (To be completed) February, 1996- International Conference on Disaster Mitigation in Health Institutions in Mexico. Representatives of government delegations, international, regional, sub-regional organizations and of non-governmental organizations from the private and scientific sector of Latin American and Caribbean met to discuss the concerns of high risk of health institutions of the populations and the countries? economic well-being. They decided to alert governments and organizations on the necessity to adopt policies for vulnerability reduction of existing health institutions or for construction before the possibility of natural hazards, with the objective of protecting the lives of patients and health personnel and to guarantee essential services. October, 1996- The Miami Congress Declaration and Plan of Action More than 200 high level delegates, representing public, private and international organizations from North, South and Central America and the Caribbean, met to discuss and promote important initiatives in favor of disaster reduction and sustainable development. Indicating the critical impact that disaster risk could have on social and economic development, the Congress offered concrete recommendations that take into account disaster reduction and sustainable development goals. December, 1996- The Presidential Congress/ Declaration and Plan of Action of Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Chiefs of State and governmental delegates of the countries of the Americas met with the purpose to reaffirm their determination to advance toward sustainable development and to implement the decisions and compromises established in the Declaration of Rio and Agenda 21. 5.3 Regional/Education Sector December, 1992- The OAS workshop in Caracas The OAS through the Unit of Sustainable Development and Environment offered the First Workshop on the Preparation of Natural Hazard Vulnerability Reduction Programs for the Education Sector based on CINTERPLAN. Almost twenty professionals from Latin America participated in this workshop. Most of them were related to physical infrastructure emergency school plans for the Ministry of Education of their respective countries. The participants discussed preparation and implementation of vulnerability reduction programs and offered comments and suggestions for the improvement of the manual that will be used in future workshops. October, 1993- OAS workshop in Trinidad The departments mentioned in the Caracas workshop presented a second workshop, with the same objectives, for the English speaking Caribbean on October 11-15, 1993 August, 1995-Resolution for the Central American School and Culture Coordination (CECC) in Guatemala. The Presidents of the Central American countries, authorized the following mandate: ?To recognize the social and economic impact cause by reoccurring natural disasters in the region and for such reason we decided to strengthen national coordination institutions of disaster prevention measures, attention and mitigation with support of CEPREDENAC, which recommends the implement of a Regional Plan for Disaster Reduction in Central America?; as a primordial element, the culturalization of the theme through the national educational systems.? Ministries, Vice-Ministries and Chiefs of Delegation resolved: a. To recognize and approve the actions supporting the Education Programs for Emergencies of the Organization of Partners of the Americas in the countries where it exists. b. Strengthen and unify criteria en different countries, tendencies to form an integral plan in Central America for disaster prevention education. c. Solicitate the distinct national and international aid organizations, for prevention and assistance projects in case of disasters. d. Solicitate the OAS and the CEE the enlarge in all of Central America the identification work of school infrastructure, for posterior negotiation of financial aid. October, 1995- Regional Meeting of the OAS-ECHO Program of Natural Hazard Vulnerability Reduction of the Education Sector in Managua. The technical public officials of the Ministry of Education of the delegations of Belize, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama, accompanied by Partners of the Americas participants, CECC, OAS-ECHO authorized with experiences based in Pilot Programs. They recommend the following: to extend the experience of all the countries in the region; to promote and implement measures to improve the educational infrastructure; to unify and strengthen criteria in relation to the information systems on the physical school infrastructure; integrate the national educational policies on disaster reduction; to promote institutional strengthening at the internal and external coordination level in the area; to strengthen at a regional level the ability to respond to disasters; to define goals in both quality and quantity based in a timetable of action oriented to facilitate the evaluation of the proposed goals; to make sure that the accomplishment of the pilot countries are a priority and they are not prejudiced by regional extension. October, 1996-Resolution and Meeting of CECC in El Salvador. The OAS with the financial support of ECHO with a basis in development plans in each country resolved: to offer an action to increase the implementation response to PRVSEPN; to support the driving regional development projects for the Central American countries through the OAS and based in components that use SIG in educational physical infrastructure information systems for Ministries of Education, in order to fortify the sectors planning process and to develop specific school building design and construction codes; to look for finances oriented to Disaster Education using the efforts developed in each country within the PREVSPN; and promote the management of natural disaster as part of the environmental education activities, within the framework of sustainable development. August, 1996- Regional Meeting of the OAS-ECHO Program on Natural Hazard Vulnerability Reduction for the Education Sector in Honduras. (To be completed) 6.0 Central Objective of the Hemispheric Plan As a result of the Hemispheric Conference in Caracas, a Hemispheric Plan of Action for Natural Hazard Vulnerability Reduction in the Education Sector was developed to be presented to government and non-government organizations of each country, related to the Education Sector (education ministries, national organisms responsible for the implementation of the education infrastructure, the public works ministries, social investment funds, municipalities, non- government organizations, and local and national voluntary organizations), in which the strategy for this sector to participate in social and natural disaster reduction is defined. The Hemispheric Plan identifies and promotes national, regional, and hemispheric mechanisms, in order to facilitate the commitment to carry out the agreed upon activities, through programs for advisory, training, technological transfer, and financial support for: The Hemispheric Plan serves as back-up for acquiring political, institutional, technical, and financial support for: . Improvement of the curriculum in primary, secondary, and university level education . Training and educating the general public . Making educational buildings adequate and safe . Establishing a concrete timetable for accomplishing goals 7.0 Hemispheric Plan Organisms International, regional and national agencies, as well as their networks and associations with disaster reduction and environmental management programs in the education sector have contributed and helped prepare this document. The contributions include representatives of several countries in the following agencies: 1. Ministries of education 2. State agencies responsible for the educational physical infrastructure 3. Non- governmental and voluntary organizations that work in the education sector 4. International organizations and regional institutions with programs in the education sector 5. Professionals and independent consultants 8.0 Organization of the Hemispheric Plan The Hemispheric Plan is divided into three areas or components. The components of the Plan encompass the academic aspects, Citizen Participation and school building physical infrastructure. The Hemispheric Plan development has been carried out with the help of figures from Institutional Coordinators, who are responsible for the organization, dissemination and contact the working sub- groups and prepare the corresponding component for the Plan. The specific aspects and the form in which they will be presented in the plan were discussed at the Hemispheric Conference. Each coordinating institution will be in charge of one working group. Each working group will be formed by a number of working sub-groups which will be headed by sub-coordinators to prepare the corresponding component for the Plan in the required detail. The working groups and sub- groups are: 8.1 Academic Aspects (AA): Includes strategies to incorporate academic program design in basic education, university education and professional education programs in several disciplines, adapting the program according to the various types of vulnerability in each country. Objective- Propose actions relating to the adoption of academic programs an the educational process to the varying types of vulnerabilities of each country. The proposals will consider academic program revision of the educational institutions, research incentives and the dissemination of available information. Sub-Areas: AA/1 Elementary education curriculum AA/2 Health curriculum (medicine, pharmacy, veterinary, dentistry and other related fields) AA/3 Science and technology curriculum (earth sciences, agronomy, architecture, engineering and other related fields) AA/4 Humanities curriculum (legal and political sciences, humanities and education, economic and social sciences and other related fields) AA/5 Research programs AA/6 Documentation centers 8.2 Citizen Participation (CP): Includes programs to be channeled through ministries of education and other institutions, to provide specific plans which will form part of specialized organization plans for bringing support to training and counseling, as well as to operational plans. Objective- Generate actions, based on experiences and initiatives that incorporate the objectives, programs for dissemination of information and projects relating to citizenship education and assistance of educational institutions. These activities form part of the community education for mitigation, monitoring, alert, preparedness and response by specialized organizations such as fire brigades, civil defense, and volunteer groups. Sub-Areas: CP/1 Public awareness and information CP/2 Training for alert, monitoring, assistance, and community recovery CP/3 Governmental and non-governmental organisms participation in the disaster reduction (civil defense, fire brigades, red cross, volunteers, etc.) CP/4 Environmental management for disaster reduction 8.3 Physical Infrastructure (PI): Includes strategies for the management and retrofitting of education buildings according to natural hazard vulnerability in order to modify planning processes, design, construction, repair, rehabilitation, reconstruction and maintenance as a function of safety for these buildings. Objective- To produce activities which seek the incorporation of concepts of security related to natural disasters in project design and evaluation requirement, and standards for the construction of physical infrastructure in the education sector. Sub-Areas PI/1 Project programming, planning and design PI/2 Codes, standards, norms and regulations PI/3 Construction systems a) Seismic zones b) Hurricane flood and drought zones PI/4 Project design PI/5 Inspection and implementation PI/6 Evaluation, reinforcement, and maintenance 9.0 Plan Implementation 9.1 Document Usefulness This document has been formulated as a reference guide for natural hazard management in the context of the education sector, based on the experiences of the components mentioned above. It is the result of work elaborated during the Hemispheric Conference implemented in Caracas, Venezuela, in collaboration with at series of institutions and with a large quantity of individuals. It is not an exhaustive or an extensive document. Nor does it represent the programming of all works and actions necessary to reduce the impact of natural disasters on the education sector. This plan is a work in progress. The Executive Committee Pro Tempore designated for its implementation should be brought together periodically in order to review, modify, update and to add to the Hemispheric Plan with the experiences that have been useful in practice and that are considered beneficial in the continuous search for solutions to the problems of he Education Sector. 9.2 What Can the Hemispheric Plan for the Participants ? Be a helping mechanism in order to make public and private entities and organizations aware of the need to adopt policies and to search for the mitigation of disasters. ? To serve as a catalyst for encouraging the participation of financial and donor organizations that can contribute economically to the development of the Plan. 9.3 What Can the Participants Do to Promote the Hemispheric Plan ? Support its adoption and implementation in the top political and technical forums of the Education Sector. ? Offer and propose ideas that help develop and expand the Hemispheric Plan. ? Provide a means for the exchange of ideas between professionals, technicians, and communities related to the Education Sector and the disaster mitigation. 9.4 Response to the Political Forum and the Education Sector in the Future A. Local Meeting of the Education Sector 1. The XVII Usual Meeting of the Ministries of Education and Culture of Central America (CECC), organized by the Central American Educational and Cultural Coordination to be implemented October 29 to November 1, 1997 in .... 2. The VII Ibero-American Conference on Education on September 25 and 26,1997 in Merida, Venezuela, convened by the Organization of Ibero-American States (OIAS). B. Meeting in Latin America and the Caribbean 1. In the framework of the Association of Caribbean States (ACS), exists a committee entitled ?Committee on Science, Technology, Education, Health and Culture? that meets periodically in different areas, but will not take place in the immediate future C. Follow-up Meeting of the Summit of Santa Cruz, Bolivia 1. The Chiefs of States and the governmental delegates of the Americas, meet in Santa Cruz de la Sierra Bolivia in December of 1996, as was decided after the Summit of the Americas that took place in Miami of 1994, in order to reaffirm determination and advancement toward sustainable development and to implement decisions and compromised established in the Declaration of Rio de Janeiro and Agenda 21, were adopted in the Conference on Environment and Development, in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. Initiative 6, under the section that pertains to health and education of the Declaration of Santa Cruz, de la Sierra Bolivia, 1996 states: ? Promote the inclusion of disease outbreak response and disaster planning, preparedness, and mitigation in national development plans ? Seek to establish, as appropriate, regional emergency response teams and regularly test contingency plans ? Promote the establishment of appropriate building construction codes that include regulatory and enforcement mechanisms through the sharing of technical information and expertise The Presidents in charge of the OAS support the countries for the implementation of this initiative. 9.5 Provisional Input List for Action and Meetings General Executive Summary Executive Summary of Academic Aspects Executive Summary of Citizen Participation Executive Summary of Physical Infrastructure 9.6 Executive Pro-Tempore Committee for the Plan Implementation (Related to the international,national and regional ) . Objectives . Structure . Composition . Themes for the Working Groups of the Executive Pro-Tempore Committee 1. Ties with the Social Investment Fund (SIF) for the plan implementation 2. Input for upper level sectoral and political meetings 3. Ties with the countries in order to give response to the El Niño response HEMISPHERIC PLAN OF ACTION FOR VULNERABILITY REDUCTION TO NATURAL HAZARDS IN THE EDUCATION SECTOR (General Introduction to the Hemispheric Plan) 3