a. What is
negotiating?
·
Negotiating is the
ability to construct common responses starting from different,
similar, or the same interests.
·
It is dialogue. It is a
type of discussion between parties aimed at reaching an agreement that
is acceptable to everyone.
·
It is bringing about a
new reality through an exchange among the parties.
![](http://www.oas.org/en/citel/infocitel/septiembre-04/img/negociacion1_i.jpg)
Negotiation can occur when three
conditions are met:
-
There is a conflict of interest:
The parties need to come to an agreement on managing and meeting
their interests.
In Daniel Dana’s book, Conflict Resolution, he says, “[d]on’t
confuse conflict with indecision, disagreement…or other common
experiences that may cause, or be caused by, conflict.” The word
“conflict” is frequently used for situations that are not conflicts.
It is therefore important for people to understand what a conflict
is before saying there is one. Conflicts occur only between parties
that need one another and that cannot simply give up their
relationship without adverse effects; they need each other, and that
is what drives the negotiation.
-
There is ambiguity about the
outcome: A given or future outcome with another party or parties
is not precisely known. Negotiation and renegotiation are common for
this reason; things are not always as clear as they appear, and the
parties need to sit down together and review and spell out their
interests; this motivates negotiation in which the parties must be
willing to engage in an exchange and/or make concessions to close a
deal or reach an agreement.
-
Agreement is possible: The
parties are willing to negotiate to reach an agreement. If not,
negotiation simply is not possible.
In order to negotiate, then, the
parties must have both the intent and commitment. Without those two
variables, sitting down at the negotiating table is useless.
Negotiations are therefore said to be successful if the parties:
-
exceed their minimum points of
agreement;
-
are able to fulfill the agreement;
-
meet most of their interests;
-
remain in a position to repeat the
experience.
It is therefore essential to detect,
explore, and be assured of the openness to the agreement; normally,
the negotiation talks and the environment leading up to them give
clues as to the possibility of reaching an agreement, even in the
midst of the necessary concessions.
c. A comprehensive
approach to negotiation
A comprehensive approach to
negotiation shows it to be a method for reaching an agreement in which
there are both cooperating and competing elements. Cooperating
elements are those points or items that have no major complications
because the parties have the same interests; competing elements are
those that can bog down the negotiations and can complicate an
agreement because of the disparity in interests; greater creativity is
needed to envisage options that are satisfactory to the parties.
![](http://www.oas.org/en/citel/infocitel/septiembre-04/img/negociacion2_i.jpg)
Likewise, in a comprehensive
approach, negotiating skill should not be confused with the ability to
do business, be a dealer, or be a merchant, etc. Doing business
involves being able to sniff out business opportunities; being a
dealer takes the typical haggling approach to negotiating where the
aim is to close the deal at hand without regard for the future or the
relationship; and being a merchant simply involves being a
salesperson.
Here it would be appropriate to
clarify one of the initial reflections about whether negotiating and
selling are the same thing. Negotiation does complement sales and
business management very well when there is space or room for
movement, negotiation or exchange; if this is not the case, what you
have is a transactional sale in which a product is offered and the
buyer decides whether or not to purchase it for the price given; in
this take-it-or-leave-it situation, price and other considerations
cannot be negotiated.
Lastly, for a comprehensive view of
negotiation it is fundamental to consider that the essence of
negotiating is not to try to win or lose. The idea is to close a deal
that is satisfactory for the two parties. Of course, one must strive
to ensure that it is more satisfactory for him/her than for the other
party. However, if one of the negotiators has all the aces up his/her
sleeve and the other does not know it, then this is not a true
negotiation, but simply an effort by the person with all the
advantages to seek the maximum gain possible, without taking into
account the wants or needs of the other party.
d. Why do we make
reaching an agreement so complex?
As a rule, the process of reaching an
agreement is not an easy one. Negotiation, by virtue of the fact that
it is an eminently human process, is complex, creates stress, anxiety,
frustration, joy, distrust, satisfaction, and power, among other
feelings and emotions. For that reason, there are some common
obstacles that hinder, delay, or stall the process. Some of these are
as follows:
-
Individual perspective in an
interdependent discipline: People tend to take individualistic
mental approaches in which their gain is someone else’s loss. We
have been taught from a tender age that in order for someone to win,
someone else has to lose. Negotiation, though, requires an
understanding that collective approaches foster agreements and that
a win/win approach does not necessarily mean the parties are equal,
but that they are interdependent. In other words, I need someone
else to get the result that I cannot achieve on my own.
-
Emotions are not checked: As
mentioned earlier, emotions weigh heavily in this process of
reaching agreements, and if one fails to understand others’ emotions
or does not control his/her own emotions, the outcome of the process
can be impacted, or the process could fail or simply come to a
standstill.
-
Preconceptions and paradigms: These
affect our behavior, through inferences or assumptions, and mire
decisions and actions in the past, where decisions and negotiation
are no longer possible. The past should help negotiators reach more
rational agreements, not block agreements.
-
Managing positions: The difficulty
understanding someone else’s interests, without necessarily
sacrificing your own, is the major dilemma and challenge for
negotiators. Unfortunately, there is a major tendency to assume
rigid positions as a way to manipulate the other party.
-
Seeing negotiation as an
instrumental discipline: In the professional field of negotiation,
some view this as a purely technical and product knowledge-driven
exercise, rather than as the honing of core soft skills that,
ultimately, can impact the key factors of success in the outcome of
a negotiation. For example, based on the premise that this is a
DIALOGUE, poor, uncreative communication influences negotiations.
e. Importance of
negotiation in modern-day administration and generally in all areas of
personal and professional life
Understanding the role and impact of
negotiations in personal, social, and business relationships is a
mandatory aptitude, skill, or ability for achieving results in any
scenario. It is interesting to observe in Stephen Covey’s book, Seven
Habits of Highly Effective People, that three of the habits, to name
just a few, are directly related to the ability to negotiate: Think
win/win; Seek first to understand, then to be understood; and
Synergize.
Let us examine how the habits are
presented in a way that moves from the individual and personal arena,
in order to achieve independence, to forging effective relationships
with others, or what Covey calls “interdependence”:
From dependence to independence
-
Be proactive (anticipate, plan)
-
Have goals in mind (a mission and a
vision)
-
First things first (distinguish
between was is urgent and was is important)
From independence to interdependence
-
Win/win approach
-
Seek first to understand, then to
be understood
-
Synergize
-
Sharpen the saw (take care of
yourself physically, emotionally, and spiritually)
It is also interesting to consider
the findings of the “Rome Club” intellectuals who met in Barcelona in
1996 to determine the skills necessary for 21st century leaders. Here
again we see negotiating skill as a core competency in today’s world.
Let us review, then, the skills they listed:
-
Vision and capacity to globalize
(manage integral, global, and local approaches);
-
Coexistence with technology
(accept, understand, use, know, coexist with, and add value to the
various modern IT and technological tools);
-
Ability to produce agreements and
resolve differences through nontraditional mechanisms (skill in
reaching agreements through constructive, creative dialogue).
Moreover the “management by
competency” organizational model in which all human processes in an
organization revolve around the skills needed to implement the mission
and achieve the business’s vision, emphasizes competencies such as:
-
Negotiating skills
-
Conflict resolution
-
Ability to reach agreements
-
Teamwork
-
Collective and synergetic
approaches
-
Openness to cooperation and service
These are key skills for efficient
individual and group management and therefore are becoming mandatory
for everyone who enters an organization.
The foregoing highlights how
important it is for leaders to develop this competency, because of the
direct, positive impact it has on organizations’ workgroups, actions,
achievements, and management style.
These topics will be explored in
depth in the “Negotiation Strategies” course being offered over the
Internet from October 11 to November 20 by CITEL, the ITU, and the
Colombian Association of Engineers (ACIEM). For more information,
please contact [email protected].
Julio Hernando Rincón
Adviser to ACIEM
for the
course "Negotiation
Strategies".
All rights reserved.
Additional Information: CITEL/OAS
will provide fifty full tuition costs for enrollment
in this distance learning course. This
course is offered
through
the ITU Center of
Excellence for the Americas platform.
For more information please visit the
CITEL fellowships web
page. |
|