| Keywords: |
Decision, Competence, Exception, Statute - article VI.4, Offer, Age discrimination, Age limit, Cause of action, Complaint allowed, Complaint allowed in part, Compulsory retirement, Contributory service, Costs, Damages, Discretion, Equal treatment, Executive Head, Extension of services, Medical fitness, Organization's interests, Receivability, Retirement, Retirement and Pension Committee, Retirement and Pension Plan, Retirement and Pension Plan - section VI, Termination, Advisory opinion, Appraisal of evidence, Burden of proof, Internal Appeal Body, Internal remedies exhausted, Lack of evidence, Staff reduction, Pension, Statute - article VI.2, Time bar, Time limit, Legitimate expectation, Joinder, Previous question, Contract, Formal flaw, Qualifications, Grounds, Limits, Procedure, Work appraisal, Budgetary reasons, Equity, Contribution, Statute - article VI, Terminal entitlements, Internal remedies, Staff Rules, Statute, General Standards, Career, Applicable law, Date of notification, Complaint, Retirement and Pension Plan - section V, Absence, Staff Rules - rule 112.2, Confirmatory decision, Misuse of authority, Budget, Organization, Rules of Procedure, Rules of Procedure - article 12, Staff Rules - rule 112, Extension, General Standards - article 56, Rules of Procedure - article 12.2, General Standards - article 55, General Standards - article 52 (e), General Standards - article 56 (e), General Standards - article 56 (g), Implicit decision, Staff Rules - rule 110.3, Staff Rules - rule 110.3 (a), Staff Rules - rule 110.3 (d), Staff Rules - rule 110.4 (e) |