|
|
Administrative Tribunal (TRIBAD)
Administrative Tribunal (TRIBAD)
  •  

Documents

Advanced search

SearchClear

This Search uses AND operators, it only returns documents with ALL the keywords you entered/selected.

Contract60 Salary43 Statute - article II41 Terminación de servicios41 Decisiones administrativas39 Indemnización38 Competencia36 Comité de Asesoramiento para casos de Reconsid.35 Agotamiento de la vía administrative previa32 Fundamentos jurídicos31 Reintegro del cargo24 Debido proceso legal24 Cargos24 Appointment23 Executive Head23 Discrecionalidad23 Secretario General22 Excepción22 Competence22 Interpretation21 Breach21 Reclasificación de cargos21 Reducción de personal20 Nulidad20 Recurso19 Servicio internacional de carrera19 Cargo vacante19 Complaint allowed in part18 Lack of evidence18 Termination17 Statute - article VII.117 Statute - article VII.217 Extensión del contrato17 Impugnación17 Violación de derechos16 Contrato a término fijo16 Inadmisibilidad de recursos16 Auditoría de cargo16 Reconsideración16 Retirement and Pension Plan16 Discretion16 Candidate16 Statute - article VI.116 Daños y perjuicios15 Damages15 Receivability15 Charter of the OAS - article 11915 Clasificación de cargos15 Recurso infundado15 Igualdad de condiciones14 Comisión de Jubilaciones y Pensiones14 Despido14 Notification14 Terms of appointment14 Injury13 Costs13 Statute - article VII13 Audiencia13 Staff Rules - rule 110.613 Costas del juicio13 Right of staff members13 Plazos13 Principios Generales del Derecho12 Vicio procesal12 Oferta de empleo12 Prescripción12 Fondo de Jubilaciones y Pensiones12 Recurso temerario12 Paridad con Naciones Unidas12 Traslado12 Irregularidad12 Descripción de funciones12 Revocación12 Retirement12 Cause of action12

COMPLAINT 186 | CARMEN SAGHY vs. SECRETARY GENERAL

Document Code (Number)113
Category:Judgment
Year:1991
Language:English
Keywords: Decision, Post classification, Competence, Formal requirements, Breach, Costs, Damages, Executive Head, Injury, Notification, Procedural flaw, Payment, Internal Appeal Body, Time limit, Legitimate expectation, Recommendation, Nullity, Bias, Candidate, Formal flaw, Competition, Qualifications, Vacancy, Report, Administration, Remand, Salary, Promotion, Administrative delay, Internal appeal, Due process, Flaw, Competition cancelled, Staff member's right, Staff Rules - rule 104.5 (b), Duty to comply, Career, Tribunal, Staff Rules - rule 104.5 (e), Absence, Staff Rules - rule 112.5 (j), Rules of Procedure - article 10, General Standards - article 12 (f), General Standards - article 8, Rules of Procedure - article 13.6, Staff Rules - rule 104.5 (f), Statute - article VII.4
Documents to download:

COMPLAINT 60 | ARNALDO I. BOITA vs. SECRETARY GENERAL

Document Code (Number)36
Category:Judgment
Year:1978
Language:Spanish
Keywords: Post classification, Abolition of post, Application, Interpretation, Quashing, Breach, Complaint allowed in part, Discretion, Executive Head, General principles, Injury, Notification, Procedural flaw, Appraisal of evidence, Internal Appeal Body, Organization's duties, Patere legem, Post description, Nullity, Competition, Vacancy, Selection Board, Appointment, Due process, Fundamentos jurídicos, Reclasificación de cargos, Abuse of process, Competition cancelled, General Standards - article 17 (a) (1977), No provision, Request for quashing, Staff Rules - rule 102.3 (e) (1976), Staff Rules - rule 104.3 (1976), Abuse of law, Anulación y reconstitución del Comité, Cancelación de aviso, Cargo vacante, Comité de Asesoramiento para casos de Reconsid., Comité de Selección de Personal, General Standards - article 17 (a), Recomendación inválida
Documents to download:

COMPLAINT 51 | HERNÁN FRÍAS MORÁN vs. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF THE INTER-AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES (IICA)

Document Code (Number)31
Category:Judgment
Year:1977
Language:Spanish
Keywords: Competence, Formal requirements, Interpretation, Breach, Complaint allowed in part, Costs, Damages, Discretion, Executive Head, General principles, Termination, Internal Appeal Body, Lack of evidence, Post description, Nullity, Contract, Non-renewal, Report, Salary, Disciplinary measure, Internal appeal, Permanent, Procedure, Due process, Equity, IICA - Staff Administration Manual, Two-year review (IICA), Terminación de servicios, Contrato permanente, Despido, Instituto Interamericano de Ciencias Agrícolas, Manual de Administración de Personal del IICA, Medida disciplinaria, Régimen de contratación bianual, Renovación contractual
Documents to download:

COMPLAINT 37 | JUAN F. BAUTA vs. SECRETARY GENERAL

Document Code (Number)25
Category:Judgment
Year:1976
Language:Spanish
Keywords: Competence, Exception, Formal requirements, Application, Interpretation, Quashing, Age limit, Breach, Cause of action, Contributory service, Discretion, Executive Head, General principles, Injury, Notification, Procedural flaw, Receivability, Retirement and Pension Plan, Appraisal of evidence, Burden of proof, Internal Appeal Body, Internal remedies exhausted, International civil service principles, Lack of evidence, Lack of injury, Patere legem, Amendment, Class action, Pension, Analogy, Nullity, Candidate, Formal flaw, Competition, Equality of conditions, Priority, Qualifications, Vacancy, International civil servant, Intervention, Limits, Selection Board, New claim, Permanent, Probation, Procedure, Due process, Effective date, Executive Order No. 75-9, Flaw, Locus standi, Medical examination, New plea, non-retroactivity, Provision, Staff Rules - rule 104.3 (b) (1975), Suspensive action, Cargos, Fundamentos jurídicos, Irretroactividad de la ley, Suspensión de reglamentación, Secretario General - Facultades, Comité de Selección de Personal, Servicio internacional de carrera, Igualdad de condiciones, Tercerías, Acción, Acción de grupo (class action), Edad máxima, Nombramiento, Orden Ejecutiva No. 75-9, Período de prueba, Reglamento de Personal - artículo 104.5 (b) (1976)
Documents to download:

COMPLAINT 36 | FERNANDO HERNÁNDEZ DE AGÜERO vs. SECRETARY GENERAL

Document Code (Number)24
Category:Judgment
Year:1976
Language:Spanish
Keywords: Decision, Admissibility, Breach, Complaint allowed, Definition, General principles, Termination, Evidence, Internal Appeal Body, Organization's duties, Reinstatement, Terms of appointment, Testimony, Contract, Disclosure of evidence, Grounds, Fixed term, Adversarial proceeding, Affidavit, Confidential evidence, Force majeure, General Standards - article 51 (1976), General Standards - article 52 (1976), Member State, Persona non grata, Procedure, Staff Rules - rule 110.4 (1975), Staff Rules - rule 110.5 (1975), Transfer, Work appraisal, Cargos, Fundamentos jurídicos, Reintegro del cargo, Comité de Asesoramiento para casos de Reconsid., Cesación de servicios, Contrato a término fijo, Fuerza mayor, Normas Generales - artículo 51-52, Persina non grata, Reglamento de Personal - artículo 110.4 (1971), Reglamento de Personal - artículo 110.5 (1971), Rescisión contractual
Documents to download:

COMPLAINT 29 | EDGARDO HOLZMAN vs. SECRETARY GENERAL

Document Code (Number)20
Category:Judgment
Year:1976
Language:Spanish
Keywords: Breach, Damages, Discretion, Executive Head, Injury, Organization's interests, Termination, Advisory body, Burden of proof, Internal Appeal Body, International civil service principles, Moral injury, Reinstatement, Statute - article VI.2, Acquired right, Legitimate expectation, Joinder, Binding character, Candidate, Competition, Equality of conditions, Priority, Qualifications, Vacancy, Administration, International civil servant, Intervention, Selection Board, Challenge of member, Probation, General Standards - article 40 (1973), Derecho de preferencia, Comité de Asesoramiento para casos de Reconsid., Excusación, Igualdad de condiciones, Plazos, Admisibilidad del recurso, Tercerías, Nombramiento, Estatuto - artículo VI.2, Normas Generales - artículo 40
Documents to download:

COMPLAINT 19 | ISABEL CHALY CASERTA vs. SECRETARY GENERAL

Document Code (Number)14
Category:Judgment
Year:1975
Language:Spanish
Keywords: Competence, Interpretation, Cause of action, Charter of the OAS - article 119, Complaint allowed in part, Damages, Discretion, Executive Head, Notification, Receivability, Advisory body, Advisory opinion, Appraisal of evidence, Burden of proof, Evidence, Internal Appeal Body, International civil service principles, Lack of evidence, Recommendation, Rules of Procedure - article 22.1 (1972), Candidate, Decision-maker, Internal candidate, Competition, Equality of conditions, General Standards - article 17 (1973), General Standards - article 17 (b) (1973), General Standards - article 38 (1973), Priority, Qualifications, Vacancy, Grounds, Charter of the OAS - article 121, Charter of the OAS - article 126, General Standards - article 11 (b) (1973), General Standards - article 35 (1973), Geographical distribution, International civil servant, Intervention, Limits, Negligence, Promotion, Selection Board, Staff Rules - rule 104.1 (1971), Staff Rules - rule 104.1 (b) (1971), Staff Rules - rule 104.11 (b) (1971), Statute - article VII, Secretario General - Facultades, Comité de Asesoramiento para casos de Reconsid., Excusación, Ascenso, Servicio internacional de carrera, Igualdad de condiciones, Nombramiento, Carta OEA - artículo 119, Normas Generales - artículo 38, Carta OEA - artículo 121, Carta OEA - artículo 126, Comité Asesor de Personal, Criterio de representación geográfica, Normas Generales - artículo 17(b), Normas Generales - artículo 35, Reclutamiento, Reglamento de Personal - artículo 104.1 (1975), Reglamento de Personal - artículo 104.11(b) (1971), Secretario General Adjunto
Documents to download:

COMPLAINTS 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 | RODOLFO T. GARCÍAN ET AL. vs. SECRETARY GENERAL

Document Code (Number)6
Category:Judgment
Year:1974
Language:English
Keywords: Post classification, Application, Interpretation, Quashing, Cause of action, Complaint allowed, Definition, Advisory body, Advisory opinion, Appraisal of evidence, Burden of proof, Evidence, Internal Appeal Body, Lack of evidence, Classification standards, Expert inquiry, Joinder, Post description, Previous question, Staff Rules - rule 102.2 (d) (1971), Staff Rules - rule 102.3 (1976), Staff Rules - rule 102.3 (b) (1971), Testimony, Fundamentos jurídicos, Clasificación de cargos, Reclasificación de cargos, Comité de Asesoramiento para casos de Reconsid., Prueba pericial, Exhibición de la prueba, Recurrentes, Admisibilidad de la prueba, Denegación, Prueba documental, Estatuto - artículo X.2 (f), Reglamento de Personal - artículo 102.3 (1971), Testigos, Exhibición de documentos
Documents to download:

COMPLAINT 3 | HERBERT N. KREBS G. vs. SECRETARY GENERAL

Document Code (Number)3
Category:Judgment
Year:1973
Language:English
Keywords: Competence, Offer, Reassingment, Staff Rules - rule 109.5 (h) (1971), Breach, Cause of action, Charter of the OAS - article 119, Complaint allowed, Damages, Discretion, Executive Head, General principles, Injury, Procedural flaw, Termination, Advisory body, Advisory opinion, Appraisal of evidence, Burden of proof, Evidence, Internal Appeal Body, Internal remedies exhausted, International civil service principles, Lack of evidence, Lack of injury, Moral injury, Organization's duties, Patere legem, Protective principle, Reinstatement, Staff reduction, Cargos, Reducción de personal, Reintegro del cargo, Secretario General - Facultades, Comité de Asesoramiento para casos de Reconsid., Oferta de empleo, Carta OEA - artículo 119, Comité de Desagravios, Reglamento de Personal - artículo 109.5 (h) (1971), Reglamento de Personal - artículo 109.5 (b) (1971)
Documents to download: