|
|
Administrative Tribunal (TRIBAD)
Administrative Tribunal (TRIBAD)
  •  

Documents

Advanced search

SearchClear

This Search uses AND operators, it only returns documents with ALL the keywords you entered/selected.

Sirvart Kouyoumdjian v. Secretary General of the Organization of American States

Document Code (Number)94
Category:Judgment
Year:1986
Language:English
Keywords: Decision, Post classification, Competence, Formal requirements, Judicial review, Right of appeal, Application, Quashing, Costs, Discretion, Executive Head, Practice, Procedural flaw, Receivability, Burden of proof, Evidence, Internal Appeal Body, Internal remedies exhausted, Lack of evidence, Lack of injury, Time bar, Time limit, Mistake, Classification standards, Expert inquiry, Post description, Previous question, Testimony, Nullity, Omission, Bias, Intention, Report, Administration, Salary, Promotion, Internal appeal, Procedure, Administration instruction, Right, Expert, Internal remedies, Post, Audit, Audit of post, Staff Rules, Staff Rules - rule 102.3, Staff Rules - rule 102.3 (c), General Standards, Date of notification, General principle, Complaint, Equal pay for equal work, Special post allowance, Staff Rules - rule 103.7, Undue enrichment, Dissenting opinion, Supervisor, Statement of intent, Waiver, Reckoning, Administrative act, Classification, General Standards - article 33, Pas de nullité sans grief, Personnel circular, Preliminary acts, Rules of Procedure, Rules of Procedure - article 12, Salary difference, Staff Rules - rule 102.3 (a), Staff Rules - rule 102.3 (b)
Documents to download:

Marijane E. Peplow v. Secretary General of the Organization of American States

Document Code (Number)88
Category:Judgment
Year:1985
Language:English
Keywords: Decision, Post classification, Competence, Formal requirements, Judicial review, Right of appeal, Statute - article I, Interpretation, Offer, Reassingment, Breach, Costs, Discretion, Equal treatment, Executive Head, Injury, Organization's interests, Termination, Appraisal of evidence, Burden of proof, Evidence, Organization's duties, Staff reduction, Recommendation, Mistake, Testimony, Nullity, Binding character, Contract, Decision-maker, Competition, Disclosure of evidence, Equality of conditions, Priority, Qualifications, Seniority, Vacancy, Working relations, General Standards - article 17 (b), Fitness, Report, Administration, Limits, Disciplinary measure, Internal appeal, Adversarial proceeding, Transfer, Work appraisal, Due process, Flaw, New plea, Budgetary reasons, Staff member's right, Right to replay, Post, Audit, International career service, General principle, Staff member's interest, Unsatisfactory service, Staff Rules - rule 110.6, International civil service, Staff regulations and rules, Staff Rules - rule 105.2, Double jeopardy, Statement of intent, Waiver, Staff Reduction Board, General Standards - article 17 (a) (v), Staff Rules - rule 110.6 (m), General Assembly - AG/RES.561 (XI-O/81), Personnel file, Administrative act, Case law, Confirmatory decision, Independence, Intent, Misuse of authority, Performance report, Plea, Procedural economy, Staff Rules - rule 110.4
Documents to download:

Alberto Vesprémy Bangha v. Secretary General and Retirement and Pension Committee of the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States

Document Code (Number)12
Category:Judgment
Year:1975
Language:English
Keywords: Decision, Competence, Exception, Interpretation, Offer, Age limit, Breach, Cause of action, Complaint allowed, Compulsory retirement, Contributory service, Damages, Executive Head, Extension of services, Medical fitness, Notification, Organization's interests, Receivability, Retirement, Retirement and Pension Committee, Retirement and Pension Plan - section VI, Staff Rules - rule 109.3 (h) (1971), Staff Rules - rule 109.4 (a) (1971), Termination, Appraisal of evidence, Lack of injury, Organization's duties, Patere legem, Terms of appointment, Acquired right, Legitimate expectation, Recommendation, Staff Rules - rule 109.3 (1971), Mistake, Staff Rules - rule 109.3 (e) (1971), Contract, Acceptance, Duty to substantiate decision, Fitness, Grounds, ILO Administrative Tribunal - Judg. 61 (1962), Report
Documents to download:

Sixto Alfredo Aquino Padrón v. Secretary General and Chairman of the Retirement and Pension Committee of the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States

Document Code (Number)11
Category:Judgment
Year:1974
Language:English
Keywords: Decision, Competence, Exception, Interpretation, Age limit, Charter of the OAS - article 119, Complaint allowed in part, Compulsory retirement, Contributory service, Executive Head, Extension of services, Notification, Organization's interests, Policies and Procedures, Receivability, Retirement, Retirement and Pension Committee, Retirement and Pension Plan - section VI, Staff Rules - rule 109.3 (h) (1971), Staff Rules - rule 109.4 (a) (1971), Termination, Internal remedies exhausted, Acquired right, Legitimate expectation, Retirement and Pension Plan - section I, Staff Rules - rule 109.3 (1971), Statute - article VI.1 (a), General Standards - article 11 (1973), Mistake, Staff Rules - rule 109.3 (e) (1971)
Documents to download: