Page 52 - GuideFWA

In the detailed engineering analysis that was performed for both the co-channel and adjacent
channel interference cases, the ETSI Technical Report on capacity considerations in DECT,
ETR 310 of August ’96, was used for the ETSI - defined model for DECT FWA.

Despite the fact that the ETSI Technical Report clearly states the expected traffic loads for
various environments, including the specific loading of 300 Erlangs per square kilometre for
developing countries . This ETSI Report was disputed as not necessarily valid by some DECT
experts.

4.6.2.35 Mitigation techniques

In some situations for some technology permutations, the levels of interference - or alternatively
the required separation distances - can be mitigated against in an intrinsic fashion. In particular
the DCA features of DECT

5. REFERENCES

[1] Report of Ad-hoc FWA/PCS Interference Experts Group. April 9th 1997. Cartagena de
Indias

[2] PCC.III Interference Experts Teleconference 5/6/1997î. Meeting Notes. A. McGregor,
Nortel. (These meeting notes were approved in the second meeting of the Experts Group
in Brasilia, see reference [3] PCC.III-770/97 rev.2. Report covering the second work
group meeting on the quantification of incompatibility issues between Fixed Wireless
Access and PCS systems in the 1850-1990 MHz band June 20th, 1997

[4] Set of results of interference calculation obtained by the Experts Group Excel
Spreadsheet Tool. September 1997.

[5] Sensitivity Methodology. A. McGregor. Nortel Canada. August 22nd 1997.

38